<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
    <channel>
        <itunes:owner>
            <itunes:name>Allen Matkins</itunes:name>
            <itunes:email>sknapp@allenmatkins.com</itunes:email>
        </itunes:owner>
        <title>Allen Matkins</title>
        <link>https://video.allenmatkins.com</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <generator>Visualplatform</generator>
        <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
        <itunes:author>Allen Matkins</itunes:author>
        <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
        <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:image href="https://video.allenmatkins.com/files/rv0.0/sitelogo.gif"/>
        
        <atom:link rel="self" href="https://video.allenmatkins.com/audiopodcast/tag/michelle dangler"/>
        <atom:link rel="next" href="https://video.allenmatkins.com/audiopodcast/tag/michelle dangler?tag=michelle+dangler&amp;p=2&amp;podcast%5fp=t&amp;https="/>
        <item>
            <enclosure url="http://video.allenmatkins.com/19476789/19940429/c2ec06d5f05ec5f34f006d42fd1e11d9/audio/podcast/19940429-1-audio.mp3" type="audio/mp3" length="1635748"/>
            <title>Brinker: California Supreme Court Clarifies Meal Period standards - Steps...</title>
            <link>http://video.allenmatkins.com/brinker-california-supreme-court-clarifies-meal-2</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.allenmatkins.com"&gt;http://www.allenmatkins.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In California, employers have been challenged for years in dealing with how to comply with cumbersome and vague meal and rest period rules. Millions of dollars have been spent to battle and/or settle countless individual lawsuits and class actions alleging meal and rest period violations. Last week the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Brinker Restaurant Group v. Superior Court of San Diego answering these questions including:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What does it mean to "provide" a meal period?&lt;br&gt;
Do meal periods have to be provided in rolling five-hour increments?&lt;br&gt;
Are early (or late) lunches allowed?&lt;br&gt;
Must employers ensure that their employees actually take these mandated breaks?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.allenmatkins.com/brinker-california-supreme-court-clarifies-meal-2"&gt;&lt;img src="http://video.allenmatkins.com/19476789/19940429/c2ec06d5f05ec5f34f006d42fd1e11d9/standard/download-1-thumbnail.jpg" width="1200" height="960"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
            <guid>http://video.allenmatkins.com/photo/19940429</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <media:title>Brinker: California Supreme Court Clarifies Meal Period standards - Steps...</media:title>
            <itunes:summary>http://www.allenmatkins.com
In California, employers have been challenged for years in dealing with how to comply with cumbersome and vague meal and rest period rules. Millions of dollars have been spent to battle and/or settle countless individual lawsuits and class actions alleging meal and rest period violations. Last week the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Brinker Restaurant Group v. Superior Court of San Diego answering these questions including:
What does it mean to "provide" a meal period?
Do meal periods have to be provided in rolling five-hour increments?
Are early (or late) lunches allowed?
Must employers ensure that their employees actually take these mandated breaks?</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:subtitle>http://www.allenmatkins.com
In California, employers have been challenged for years in dealing with how to comply with cumbersome and vague meal and rest period rules. Millions of dollars have been spent to battle and/or settle countless...</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:author>Allen Matkins</itunes:author>
            <itunes:duration>04:33</itunes:duration>
            <media:description type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.allenmatkins.com"&gt;http://www.allenmatkins.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In California, employers have been challenged for years in dealing with how to comply with cumbersome and vague meal and rest period rules. Millions of dollars have been spent to battle and/or settle countless individual lawsuits and class actions alleging meal and rest period violations. Last week the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Brinker Restaurant Group v. Superior Court of San Diego answering these questions including:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What does it mean to "provide" a meal period?&lt;br&gt;
Do meal periods have to be provided in rolling five-hour increments?&lt;br&gt;
Are early (or late) lunches allowed?&lt;br&gt;
Must employers ensure that their employees actually take these mandated breaks?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.allenmatkins.com/brinker-california-supreme-court-clarifies-meal-2"&gt;&lt;img src="http://video.allenmatkins.com/19476789/19940429/c2ec06d5f05ec5f34f006d42fd1e11d9/standard/download-1-thumbnail.jpg" width="1200" height="960"/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</media:description>
            <media:content url="https://video.allenmatkins.com/v.ihtml/player.html?token=c2ec06d5f05ec5f34f006d42fd1e11d9&amp;source=podcast&amp;photo%5fid=19940429" width="625" height="352" type="text/html" medium="video" duration="273" isDefault="true" expression="full"/>
            <media:thumbnail url="http://video.allenmatkins.com/19476789/19940429/c2ec06d5f05ec5f34f006d42fd1e11d9/standard/download-1-thumbnail.jpg" width="1200" height="960"/>
            <itunes:image href="http://video.allenmatkins.com/19476789/19940429/c2ec06d5f05ec5f34f006d42fd1e11d9/standard/download-1-thumbnail.jpg/thumbnail.jpg"/>
            <category>BRINKER DECISION</category>
            <category>allen matkins</category>
            <category>california supreme court</category>
            <category>californiacalifornia</category>
            <category>court</category>
            <category>labor &amp; employment</category>
            <category>michelle dangler</category>
            <category>pat grady</category>
            <category>supreme</category>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
